By Simpson Global Media News Desk
The Federal Government has approved the comprehensive modernisation and upgrade of four major ports outside Lagos — Onne, Rivers, Delta and Calabar — in a move designed to expand Nigeria’s maritime capacity, create additional gateways for international trade and reduce the concentration of cargo traffic around the Lagos port corridor.
The Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Adegboyega Oyetola, announced the approval on September 27, 2026, saying the programme would complement the previously approved modernisation of Apapa and Tin Can Island ports in Lagos. The government has also approved the development of several new deep seaports across the country.
The latest decision places six existing major ports under the current federal modernisation programme and forms part of a broader attempt to build a more geographically distributed maritime and logistics system.
According to Oyetola, the objective is not simply to refurbish individual port facilities but to create a network in which ports, roads, railways, inland waterways and other transport infrastructure work together to move cargo more efficiently.
The minister said improved port infrastructure should help Nigerian businesses spend less time and resources transporting goods, while creating conditions capable of supporting trade, investment, industrial activity and employment.
Four Ports Added to Modernisation Programme
The four facilities covered by the latest approval are Onne and Rivers ports in Rivers State, Delta Port in Delta State and Calabar Port in Cross River State.
They occupy different positions within Nigeria’s southern maritime economy.
Onne is located within the Onne Oil and Gas Free Zone in Rivers State and serves as an important gateway for oil and gas-related activity as well as containerised and general cargo. The Oil and Gas Free Zones Authority says the Onne complex contains the Federal Ocean Terminal and Federal Lighter Terminal and is home to major oil companies and more than 220 service companies.
Onne Multipurpose Terminal, one of the facilities operating within the complex, describes itself as a gateway serving southern, eastern and northern Nigerian markets. Its infrastructure includes a deep-water quay, warehousing, a large yard and modern cargo-handling equipment.
The Rivers Port, located in Port Harcourt, also has an important role in the regional economy. Delta Port provides another maritime gateway along the Niger Delta, while Calabar Port serves Cross River and neighbouring markets.
The federal government’s decision therefore affects ports serving areas with substantial industrial, agricultural, energy, manufacturing and commercial activity.
Oyetola said the government’s intention was to strengthen these facilities so they can meet the demands of a growing economy and play a larger role in national trade.
Why the Government Is Looking Beyond Lagos
Nigeria’s maritime trade has historically been heavily concentrated around Lagos.
Apapa and Tin Can Island remain major gateways for cargo entering and leaving the country, and the government has already approved their modernisation.
The federal government now says expanding the programme beyond Lagos is necessary to create additional efficient gateways and reduce the pressure associated with concentrating cargo flows around one major commercial centre.
Oyetola said the new approvals would complement the investments planned for Apapa and Tin Can Island and help reduce the concentration of cargo traffic around Lagos.
For importers and exporters, geographical diversification can matter because the location of a port relative to factories, warehouses, farms, distribution centres and consumer markets affects the cost and time required to move goods after they arrive at the waterfront.
A business importing equipment for a factory in the South-East, for example, may face a different logistics calculation depending on whether cargo enters through Lagos or through a port closer to its eventual destination.
Similarly, exporters operating in the South-South and South-East may benefit from more efficient access to ports in their region if those facilities can provide dependable shipping services, cargo handling, customs processing and road connections.
The government’s stated objective is therefore broader than increasing the physical size of port facilities.
It is to create a network capable of distributing cargo more efficiently across different economic corridors.
Port Efficiency Remains a Business Issue
The modernisation announcement comes against a backdrop of rising activity across Nigeria’s ports but also continuing operational challenges.
A Nigerian Ports Authority performance review covering the first half of 2026 found that average vessel turnaround time increased to 5.3 days from five days during the corresponding period of 2025.
The NPA characterised the six per cent deterioration as negative performance. The review excluded crude oil terminals and covered seven ports. Five of the seven recorded longer turnaround times during the period.
The figures varied considerably from one port to another.
Delta Port’s average turnaround time rose to 5.2 days from 3.4 days in the first half of 2025.
Calabar’s increased to 6.1 days from 5.7 days.
Rivers Port, however, improved from 10 days to 8.1 days, although it remained the slowest among the seven ports measured.
Onne also improved, with average turnaround time falling from 3.6 days to 3.3 days despite a 26.6 per cent increase in vessel traffic.
The figures underline an important distinction in the government’s modernisation programme: adding infrastructure and increasing capacity are not necessarily the same thing as improving efficiency.
A port can have additional berths or cargo-handling equipment but still face delays if ships encounter restrictions in approach channels, cargo clearance takes too long, equipment is unavailable, roads are congested or cargo cannot be moved efficiently from the terminal into the wider transport network.
That is why the minister’s emphasis on an integrated system linking ports with roads, rail and inland waterways is significant to the broader programme.
Cargo Volumes Are Increasing
The push to upgrade the port network also comes as the volume of activity handled by Nigerian ports has been rising.
The Nigerian Ports Authority reported that total cargo throughput reached about 68.3 million metric tonnes in the first half of 2026, up 12.2 per cent from approximately 60.8 million tonnes during the same period in 2025.
The number of ships handled also increased.
NPA data showed 2,300 ships were handled during the first half of 2026, compared with 2,152 in the corresponding period of 2025, representing growth of about 6.9 per cent.
Gross registered tonnage increased by 20.9 per cent to about 96.6 million from roughly 79.9 million.
Container traffic also expanded.
Total container throughput rose by 10.3 per cent to 815,346 twenty-foot equivalent units, or TEUs, from 709,142 TEUs in the first half of 2025.
Container imports accounted for 546,755 TEUs, or 67 per cent of the total, while exports represented 203,980 TEUs, about 25 per cent.
Transshipment traffic recorded particularly strong growth, rising by 169.5 per cent to 35,570 TEUs, although it remained a relatively small component of total container traffic.
The figures point to a maritime sector handling increasing volumes while still needing to improve the speed and predictability with which ships and cargo move through the system.
Onne Shows the Importance of Regional Capacity
Onne provides a particularly relevant example of the potential for ports outside Lagos to take on a larger role.
NPA data for the first half of 2026 showed that vessel calls at Onne increased by 26.6 per cent. The increase was associated largely with LNG exports, and Onne accounted for 22.7 per cent of national cargo throughput in the period, according to reports based on NPA data.
The port’s existing infrastructure has also attracted investment from private operators.
Onne Multipurpose Terminal says it operates a 1,000-metre heavy-lift quay and a 45-hectare yard, with four modern mobile harbour cranes and facilities for containers, general cargo, project cargo, heavy lift and roll-on/roll-off operations.
The terminal’s history also illustrates how private investment and public infrastructure interact.
International Container Terminal Services Inc., which operates OMT, began commercial operations there in 2021. The company said at the time that the terminal was intended to increase container-handling capacity in Eastern Nigeria and invest in equipment, technology and infrastructure.
More recently, Onne has demonstrated an ability to handle large container vessels.
In 2024, ICTSI reported that its Onne operation handled the 300-metre, 6,660-TEU KOTA CEMPAKA, which it described as the largest container vessel to conduct full operations in Eastern Nigeria at the time.
These developments illustrate why government investment in channels, roads and supporting infrastructure can have implications beyond the physical port itself.
The Challenge at Calabar
Calabar presents a different set of infrastructure considerations.
The port is strategically located in Cross River State and has potential relevance for regional commerce, including trade involving eastern Nigeria and neighbouring countries.
But its ability to handle larger volumes depends on infrastructure and navigational conditions.
The National Hydrographic Agency announced on September 27 that it planned to release three new nautical charts covering the approaches to Calabar, Jamestown and the Port of Calabar on October 1, 2026.
The agency said the updated charts were intended to provide current hydrographic information to support safe and efficient navigation along the Calabar maritime corridor.
This development highlights an important part of port modernisation that is sometimes less visible than cranes, warehouses and berths.
Ports also depend on reliable navigational information, channels, dredging, pilotage, safety systems and marine infrastructure.
A port can only attract larger and more frequent commercial calls if shipping companies can operate there with reasonable predictability.
For Calabar, therefore, the success of any modernisation programme will depend not only on what happens inside the terminal but also on the wider marine environment connecting the port to the sea.
Rivers Port Still Faces Efficiency Pressure
The Rivers Port also illustrates the difference between improvement and completion of the modernisation challenge.
The NPA’s first-half performance figures showed Rivers Port reducing average vessel turnaround time from 10 days to 8.1 days.
That represented an improvement, but the port still had the longest average turnaround among the seven ports covered by the NPA review.
The implication for businesses is straightforward: an improvement in a performance indicator does not necessarily mean the underlying logistics constraints have disappeared.
For shipping lines, importers and exporters, vessel turnaround time can affect scheduling and costs.
Delays may have consequences for berth availability, shipping schedules, storage, inland transportation and the movement of goods to their final destinations.
The federal government’s stated goal of making cargo movement more predictable and cost-effective therefore requires improvements across the entire chain.
Delta Port and the Need for Supporting Infrastructure
Delta Port is another example of the infrastructure challenge.
The NPA performance review reported that the port’s average vessel turnaround time increased from 3.4 days in the first half of 2025 to 5.2 days in the first half of 2026.
The deterioration comes even as the national maritime system has experienced increasing cargo and vessel volumes.
This suggests that the government’s latest approval will have to address specific operational constraints rather than rely solely on the assumption that additional infrastructure will automatically translate into faster cargo movement.
The broader port system requires functioning channels, berths, cargo equipment, customs procedures, roads, rail links, storage facilities and connections to production centres.
For businesses, each additional delay in that chain can add cost.
The minister therefore linked the port programme to a wider integrated logistics vision rather than treating port facilities as isolated infrastructure projects.
Six Existing Ports Now in the Modernisation Drive
With the latest approval, the government’s existing-port modernisation programme covers four ports outside Lagos in addition to Apapa and Tin Can Island.
BusinessDay reported that this brings six existing major ports under the current modernisation programme.
The government has not, however, publicly disclosed a single financing figure covering the newly approved modernisation of Onne, Rivers, Delta and Calabar.
It has also not announced a complete procurement timetable or a single commencement date for construction work at all four locations.
That distinction matters.
Government approval of a modernisation programme establishes policy direction, but implementation still involves design, financing, procurement, contracting, construction, equipment installation, operational integration and, in some cases, environmental and regulatory processes.
The timing and scale of actual improvements will therefore depend on subsequent implementation decisions.
The Lagos projects provide a separate example of the financing process.
BusinessDay reported that the modernisation of Apapa and Tin Can Island is backed by a £746 million facility, with planned improvements including cargo-handling infrastructure, automation and technology intended to support smarter and greener operations.
The government has not said that the same financing structure applies to the four newly approved ports.
Six New Deep Seaports Also in the Wider Plan
The government’s maritime strategy goes beyond upgrading existing facilities.
Oyetola said the latest approval forms part of a wider programme that includes federal approvals for the development of six new deep seaports.
They are the Ibom Deep Seaport in Akwa Ibom State, Bakassi Deep Seaport in Cross River State, Agge Deep Seaport in Bayelsa State, Gateway Deep Seaport in Ogun State, Ondo Deep Seaport in Ondo State and Bonny Deep Seaport in Rivers State.
Taken together, the projects represent a proposed expansion of Nigeria’s maritime footprint across several coastal states.
The government says the combination of existing-port modernisation and new deep-seaport development will increase capacity, create stronger economic corridors and support Nigeria’s ambition to play a larger role in regional maritime trade.
But each project will have to move through its own development and financing stages.
The existence of an approval should therefore not be interpreted as evidence that all six deep-sea projects are simultaneously under construction.
The same distinction applies to the four existing ports approved for modernisation.
What It Means for Importers and Exporters
For businesses, the significance of the policy will ultimately be measured in practical outcomes.
These include how long vessels wait to berth, how quickly cargo is discharged, how efficiently customs and terminal processes operate, how quickly containers leave the port and how reliably trucks, rail services and inland waterways move goods to their destinations.
The minister said the government wants businesses to spend less time and resources moving goods.
That objective is directly linked to the cost of doing business in Nigeria.
When logistics systems are unpredictable, businesses may have to carry additional inventory, pay for storage, arrange alternative transport or absorb delays in production and distribution.
More efficient ports can reduce some of these pressures.
However, the effect of port investment will depend on the wider logistics network.
A modernised terminal connected to a congested road system may still face delays.
Likewise, a port with adequate berth capacity may not operate efficiently if cargo documentation, customs clearance or inland transportation remains slow.
The government’s stated vision of integrating ports with roads, railways and inland waterways therefore becomes an important component of the business case for the investment.
Regional Economic Implications
The four ports are located in regions with significant economic activity.
Onne and Rivers serve the South-South and the wider eastern Nigerian market.
Delta Port is positioned within one of the country’s major energy-producing regions.
Calabar has the potential to serve Cross River and surrounding areas while providing an eastern maritime gateway.
More effective use of these ports could reduce the need for some cargo destined for southern and eastern markets to move through Lagos before travelling inland.
That could change cargo-routing patterns if shipping lines, importers, exporters and logistics companies find the alternative gateways commercially attractive.
However, cargo does not move simply because infrastructure exists.
Shipping companies need reliable demand, appropriate vessel services, competitive costs, adequate draft and dependable turnaround.
Importers and exporters also need predictable customs and terminal procedures and efficient inland connections.
The government will therefore need to work with terminal operators, shipping companies, state governments and private investors to translate infrastructure approvals into functioning commercial routes.
Oyetola specifically identified state governments, terminal operators, investors and shipping companies among the stakeholders with whom the ministry intends to work.
Investment and Industrial Development
The government also sees port infrastructure as part of a broader industrial strategy.
Efficient ports can support manufacturers by improving access to imported machinery, intermediate goods and raw materials.
They can also support exporters by making it easier to move agricultural commodities, manufactured products and processed materials to international markets.
This is particularly relevant to Nigeria’s effort to expand non-oil exports.
The country’s ability to move goods efficiently to international markets is an important part of whether domestic producers can compete with companies in other countries.
Port infrastructure can also support investment decisions.
Companies considering where to establish factories or distribution centres typically assess transport access alongside electricity, land, labour, taxes, market size and regulatory conditions.
The availability of multiple efficient maritime gateways could therefore influence the location of some industrial and logistics investments.
But the economic benefit depends on implementation.
A port project must deliver reliable service at commercially viable costs if it is to change how businesses route their cargo.
Infrastructure Alone Will Not Settle Every Problem
The government’s announcement is significant in scale, but the available information also shows why infrastructure expansion should be considered alongside operational reform.
The first-half NPA data showed cargo throughput increasing by 12.2 per cent and container traffic by 10.3 per cent, while average vessel turnaround time nevertheless worsened by six per cent.
The same data showed different outcomes across ports.
Onne and Rivers improved their turnaround times, while Delta and Calabar recorded deterioration.
The figures suggest that port performance is shaped by several factors at once.
These include cargo mix, vessel traffic, berth availability, marine access, equipment, terminal operations and landside logistics.
The modernisation programme therefore presents an opportunity to address these issues collectively.
It also gives government and industry stakeholders an opportunity to establish measurable performance targets.
Such targets could include vessel turnaround times, cargo dwell times, berth productivity, customs clearance times, truck turnaround times and the volume of cargo handled outside the Lagos corridor.
Clear measurements would make it easier to determine whether the infrastructure investment is translating into lower costs and faster trade.
The Financing Question
One of the central issues still to be clarified is how the four newly approved projects will be financed.
The government has announced the approvals and objectives, but a comprehensive financing structure for Onne, Rivers, Delta and Calabar has not been publicly detailed in the reports announcing the decision.
The financing model will matter because port modernisation can involve substantial expenditure on dredging, breakwaters, berths, cargo-handling equipment, terminal technology, roads, rail connections and marine safety systems.
Private terminal operators may finance some infrastructure within their concession areas, while the government may be responsible for common-use infrastructure such as channels and access roads.
Different projects can therefore require different combinations of public funding, concession investment, commercial finance and development financing.
The government’s previous financing arrangement for the Lagos ports should not automatically be assumed to apply to the four newly approved facilities.
The details of financing, procurement and implementation will need to emerge as the programme progresses.
What Happens Next
The next stage is expected to involve detailed planning and coordination among the Federal Ministry of Marine and Blue Economy, the Nigerian Ports Authority, state governments, terminal operators, investors and shipping companies.
The government has said it intends to work with these stakeholders to ensure that the projects produce practical improvements rather than remain at the level of approvals.
For the individual ports, the work required is likely to differ.
Some may require improvements to marine access and channels.
Others may need upgraded cargo-handling equipment, berth rehabilitation, terminal technology, storage facilities or stronger road and rail connections.
Calabar’s navigational requirements, for instance, make hydrographic information and marine access particularly relevant, while Onne’s growing traffic demonstrates the need to keep infrastructure aligned with rising demand.
The government will also have to determine procurement arrangements, implementation schedules and financing structures.
Until those details are established, the September 27 approval should be understood as a major policy and infrastructure decision rather than evidence that the physical upgrades have already been completed.
A Wider Test for Nigeria’s Logistics Economy
Nigeria’s port system sits at the centre of the country’s international trade.
Its performance affects manufacturers importing machinery, retailers bringing in merchandise, farmers and processors exporting agricultural products, energy companies moving equipment, and logistics companies transporting goods across the country.
The federal government’s decision to extend modernisation beyond Lagos therefore has implications for a wide range of businesses.
The latest programme also comes at a time when maritime activity is expanding.
The NPA’s first-half data showed higher cargo volumes, more vessel calls, increased container traffic and a substantial increase in vehicle handling, but also a deterioration in average vessel turnaround time.
That combination creates both an opportunity and a challenge.
Growing trade can provide a stronger commercial base for investment in port infrastructure.
At the same time, increasing traffic can place greater pressure on facilities that are not upgraded quickly enough.
The four newly approved modernisation projects are therefore being announced against a background of rising demand rather than falling demand.
Beyond Lagos
The central idea behind the government’s latest decision is a more distributed Nigerian maritime system.
Instead of relying predominantly on Lagos for international cargo, the government wants existing facilities in other regions to become more effective while new deep-sea ports are developed.
If successfully implemented, such a system could provide businesses with additional routing options and strengthen links between coastal ports and inland production and consumption centres.
But the final outcome will depend on execution.
The approval itself does not guarantee faster vessel turnaround, lower freight charges or increased investment.
Those outcomes would depend on the quality of the infrastructure delivered, the efficiency of port operations, the reliability of marine access, the effectiveness of customs and cargo-clearance procedures, and the quality of connections to roads, rail and inland waterways.
For now, the federal government has established the direction of travel: modernise Onne, Rivers, Delta and Calabar, complement the Lagos port upgrades, and pursue a wider network of deep-sea ports.
The next test will be turning those approvals into functioning infrastructure capable of handling Nigeria’s growing trade volumes.
As Oyetola put it, the government’s stated objective is an integrated maritime and logistics system in which the different components work together to facilitate cargo movement.
For Nigerian businesses, the practical measure of success will ultimately be whether that system makes the movement of goods faster, more predictable and less costly.
That will determine whether the new port strategy becomes more than an infrastructure programme — and whether Nigeria can convert its extensive coastline, large domestic market and regional trade position into a more efficient maritime economy.
Comments
Post a Comment