Farmers call for urgent intervention
Farmers in Nigeria’s Federal Capital Territory (FCT) have called on the government, private investors and development partners to improve access to farmland, provide modern agricultural equipment and establish processing facilities, warning that inadequate resources continue to constrain agricultural production and farmers’ earnings.
The appeal was made during the 2026 FCT Farmers’ Day and International Year of Women Farmers Celebration, held from October 13 to 14 at the Cyprian Ekwensi Centre for Art and Culture in Area 10, Garki, Abuja.
The event was organised by the Federal Capital Territory chapter of the All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN), in partnership with Visionary Women in Agricultural Development in Africa (VIWADA), with support from the FCT Women Affairs Secretariat. It brought together farmers, government representatives, investors and other stakeholders to discuss practical measures for strengthening agricultural productivity and food security.
The farmers identified declining access to agricultural land, insufficient mechanisation, limited processing capacity, inadequate financing and difficulties accessing markets as major constraints requiring coordinated action.
Their demands reflect a wider challenge facing agricultural development in Nigeria: increasing food production requires more than encouraging farmers to cultivate their land. Farmers also need reliable access to productive farmland, affordable inputs, appropriate equipment, storage, processing facilities and dependable routes to market.
The concerns were raised as Nigeria prepared to mark World Food Day on October 16, with the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security announcing activities centred on the theme, “Innovate Today, Nourish Tomorrow.”
The farmers’ appeal and the forthcoming commemoration have placed renewed attention on the practical investments required to translate food security objectives into improved production, reduced waste and stronger rural livelihoods. (Sources: City Post, October 14, 2026; Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security.)
Pressure on farmland in the Federal Capital Territory
One of the principal concerns raised at the celebration was the growing pressure on land available for agricultural activities across the FCT.
AFAN National Deputy President, Chief Daniel Okafor, said farmers continued to contribute to domestic food supplies and agricultural exports despite increasing production costs and declining access to farmland.
He expressed concern that expanding housing projects and other development activities were reducing the space available for cultivation in the territory.
The issue is particularly significant in a territory where urban expansion, infrastructure development and the demand for residential and commercial land must coexist with agricultural activities that supply food to households and businesses.
As settlements expand, farmland can become more difficult to secure, particularly for smallholder farmers who may not have the financial resources to compete for land or relocate their operations to more distant areas.
For farmers, losing access to a cultivated plot can mean more than losing acreage. It can disrupt planting schedules, weaken established relationships with buyers, increase transportation costs and make previous investments in soil improvement, irrigation or farm infrastructure more difficult to recover.
The availability of land also influences whether farmers can expand production, introduce crop rotation, establish irrigation systems or cultivate several crops in a planned sequence.
Where farmers cannot secure suitable land for an extended period, they may be less willing to invest in improvements that require several seasons to produce financial returns.
However, the demands made at the Abuja celebration did not include a quantified estimate of farmland lost to urban expansion, the number of farmers directly affected or the total additional acreage required.
Such information would be important for policymakers seeking to establish the scale of the problem and determine which interventions should receive priority.
A practical response would require reliable information about existing agricultural land, current land use, farmers' locations and the areas where farming remains viable alongside urban development.
Authorities would also need to consider access to water, road connections, soil conditions, tenure arrangements and the distance between farms and markets when identifying land for agricultural use.
Simply allocating additional acreage would not necessarily solve farmers' problems if the land were unsuitable for cultivation, difficult to reach or located far from essential services.
The challenge, therefore, is to develop arrangements that protect viable agricultural activity while accommodating the FCT's changing settlement patterns.
Why access to land matters for food security
Farmland is the starting point of agricultural production, but access to it affects almost every subsequent decision a farmer makes.
A farmer who has secure access to a suitable plot can plan planting, invest in soil management, organise labour and consider improvements such as irrigation or farm roads.
By contrast, uncertainty over whether land will remain available can discourage investment and limit the scale of operations.
This matters because agricultural productivity depends not only on the number of hectares cultivated but also on how effectively farmers can use them.
Suitable land, quality seeds, timely planting, fertiliser where appropriate, effective weed management and access to water all influence the quantity and quality of harvested crops.
The FCT farmers' appeal for land must therefore be considered alongside their demands for modern equipment, finance and processing facilities.
These requirements are interconnected. Access to farmland without suitable equipment can leave farmers struggling to cultivate it efficiently. Equipment without access to land may remain underused. Increased production without storage or processing can create fresh problems if crops cannot reach buyers before deteriorating.
A coordinated agricultural programme would need to address these constraints together rather than treating each one as an isolated issue.
For the government, that means identifying the specific obstacles confronting farmers in different communities and developing interventions that match local production conditions.
For investors, it means recognising that agricultural opportunities depend on the strength of the entire value chain, including production, aggregation, transportation, processing and distribution.
For farmers, it means having a realistic opportunity to increase output while managing costs and securing a reasonable return on their work.
AFAN identifies mechanisation as another priority
Beyond land access, farmers called for greater availability of modern agricultural machinery, including tractors and equipment that can help them cultivate land more efficiently.
AFAN FCT Chairman and VIWADA Founder and President, Hon. Perpetual Nkechi Okafor, identified access to land for cluster farming, modern machinery, cottage industries and processing centres as major priorities for the territory's farmers.
She also appealed to the authorities to release tractors reportedly lying unused at the premises of the National Agricultural Seeds Council for distribution to farmers who need them.
The request raises an important operational question: how can agricultural equipment already available within public institutions be assessed and, where appropriate, made accessible to farmers who lack the machinery needed for their work?
The reported presence of unused tractors was presented as a concern by the AFAN FCT chairman. The event report did not establish how many tractors were involved, their mechanical condition, their ownership arrangements or the reasons they were reportedly not being used.
Those details would need to be verified before authorities could determine whether the equipment could be repaired, redeployed or assigned to a suitable agricultural mechanisation programme.
Nevertheless, the request highlights the distinction between purchasing equipment and ensuring that equipment is put to productive use.
Tractors and other machinery can help farmers prepare land, undertake time-sensitive operations and reduce dependence on labour-intensive methods. Depending on the equipment available and the crops being cultivated, mechanisation can also support planting, harvesting and the movement of produce.
The benefits, however, depend on proper maintenance, operator training, access to spare parts, fuel availability and arrangements for repairs.
A tractor that breaks down during a critical stage of the planting season may provide little practical value to a farmer who cannot obtain timely repairs.
Similarly, equipment that is technically available but too expensive to hire may remain beyond the reach of smallholders.
These considerations make equipment management and service delivery as important as the initial provision of machinery.
Shared machinery could improve access for smallholders
One possible approach is to expand arrangements through which groups of farmers can hire equipment when needed rather than requiring every farmer to purchase a tractor independently.
Under a properly managed shared-service model, machinery can serve multiple farms according to an agreed schedule, allowing its operating costs to be spread across several users.
Such arrangements can be particularly useful for farmers whose individual holdings are too small to justify purchasing expensive equipment.
They also create opportunities for trained operators and local service providers to earn income by preparing land, carrying out other field operations and maintaining machinery.
For these arrangements to work, however, farmers need transparent pricing, reliable booking systems and clear rules governing equipment allocation.
Scheduling is especially important when many farmers need machinery at the same time. If access is delayed until after the appropriate planting period, the service may arrive too late to deliver its intended benefits.
Public agencies and agricultural associations could help coordinate demand, identify underserved communities and establish service standards.
Private operators could also participate where the cost of maintaining equipment can be recovered through affordable hiring fees.
The FCT farmers' call does not establish that a new shared-equipment scheme has been approved. Such a programme would require decisions on funding, ownership, management, maintenance and eligibility.
The immediate issue is whether available machinery can be inventoried and assessed, and whether an accountable mechanism can make suitable equipment accessible to farmers who need it.
Women farmers seek more inclusive mechanisation
The celebration also highlighted the particular importance of making agricultural equipment accessible to women.
Perpetual Nkechi Okafor called for gender-friendly machinery that could be operated effectively by both male and female farmers.
The request recognises that access to equipment is not simply a question of whether machinery exists. Its design, operating requirements, availability and cost can determine which farmers are realistically able to use it.
Women participate in different parts of agricultural production and related value chains, but their ability to expand their activities can be affected by unequal access to land, finance, equipment, training and markets.
At the Abuja event, Acting Mandate Secretary of the FCT Women Affairs Secretariat, Hajia Asmau Mukhtar, commended women farmers for their contributions to food production despite challenges in accessing resources and expanding their agricultural activities.
She reaffirmed the secretariat's commitment to supporting farmers and described the International Year of Women Farmers as an opportunity to recognise women's contribution and encourage greater investment in their participation in agriculture.
These concerns suggest that agricultural support programmes should assess who benefits from equipment distribution, training and financing rather than relying solely on the total number of machines purchased or farmers registered.
For example, a programme could examine whether women can access equipment at the times they need it, whether training is available to them and whether hiring costs are affordable for farmers operating on a small scale.
Equipment selection should be based on the tasks farmers need to perform and the conditions in which they work.
Smaller machinery and appropriately designed implements may be useful for some activities, while larger equipment may be suitable for other operations.
The relevant choice depends on the crop, terrain, field size, available skills and operating costs.
Women farmers should be involved in decisions about these requirements so that the equipment and services provided respond to their actual needs.
The event organisers also called for practical support from government agencies, financial institutions, agricultural companies and development partners.
The effectiveness of any resulting programme would depend on whether these commitments lead to accessible services and measurable improvements in farmers' productive capacity.
Processing facilities could reduce post-harvest losses
Another major demand concerned the establishment of agricultural processing facilities, including cottage industries and local processing centres.
AFAN FCT's chairman said processing facilities could help farmers preserve produce, minimise post-harvest losses, create employment and increase incomes.
The request addresses a problem that can arise when agricultural production increases faster than the capacity to store, transport, process or sell the resulting harvest.
Some crops deteriorate quickly after harvesting, while others require drying, cleaning, milling, cooling, packaging or other treatment before they can be stored safely or sold to particular buyers.
When these services are unavailable or too expensive, farmers may be forced to sell quickly, even when prices are unfavourable.
In other circumstances, delays in transportation or the absence of suitable storage can reduce the quality and quantity of produce that reaches consumers.
Processing can help address some of these challenges by converting agricultural commodities into products with different storage characteristics or commercial uses.
Depending on local production patterns, facilities might support activities such as grain cleaning and milling, cassava processing, oilseed processing, fruit drying or the handling and packaging of vegetables.
The appropriate investment would depend on the crops produced in each area, the quantities available, the demand for processed products and the costs of operating the facility.
A processing centre cannot remain viable simply because a building and machinery have been provided. It needs a reliable supply of raw materials, competent management, suitable energy and water services, maintenance arrangements and access to buyers.
Without those conditions, facilities risk operating below capacity or becoming costly assets that do not deliver sufficient benefits to farmers.
The FCT farmers' appeal therefore points towards the need for practical planning before processing infrastructure is established.
Authorities and investors would need to determine which crops are produced in sufficient quantities, how far farmers travel to existing facilities and what products local or regional markets are prepared to purchase.
They would also need to consider food safety, product quality, packaging, regulatory requirements and the availability of working capital.
Where demand is established, well-managed processing facilities could provide an additional route to market while creating employment in transportation, equipment maintenance, packaging, distribution and related services.
Connecting production to dependable markets
The demand for better market access was another component of the farmers' appeal.
The farmers urged private investors and development partners to support smallholders with finance, improved agricultural inputs and stronger market connections.
Production is only one stage of an agricultural business. Farmers must also identify buyers, agree on prices, organise transportation and ensure that produce meets the required quality standards.
When market arrangements are weak, farmers may find it difficult to plan production or negotiate favourable terms.
A more dependable market system can help farmers make decisions about which crops to grow, how much to plant and whether investing in improved equipment or inputs is commercially worthwhile.
Buyers and processors also benefit when they can obtain consistent supplies of produce that meets agreed specifications.
One way to strengthen these relationships is through transparent arrangements between farmer groups, aggregators, processors, wholesalers and other purchasers.
Such arrangements can clarify expected quantities, quality requirements, delivery schedules and payment terms.
They may also help farmers coordinate production so that buyers can obtain sufficient volumes without dealing separately with numerous small suppliers.
However, agreements must be realistic and fair. Farmers need clear information about pricing, grading, deductions and payment schedules.
If a farmer delivers produce but payment is delayed, the resulting cash-flow pressure can affect the ability to purchase inputs or pay workers for the next production cycle.
Likewise, buyers need confidence that suppliers can meet agreed quality and delivery requirements.
Farmer organisations can help bridge these interests by supporting collective marketing, providing information and helping members understand commercial agreements.
The organisers of the Abuja celebration encouraged stakeholders to turn commitments into practical support through better access to land, machinery, finance, markets and processing infrastructure.
Whether these demands produce lasting improvements will depend partly on the development of commercial relationships that remain viable after individual events and announcements have ended.
Financing remains central to agricultural expansion
The farmers' call for financial support reflects the capital-intensive nature of many agricultural activities.
Farmers must often pay for land preparation, seeds, fertiliser, crop protection, labour, transportation and other inputs before receiving income from their harvests.
This creates a financing gap between the time money is spent and the time agricultural products are sold.
The gap can be difficult to manage when farmers face unpredictable weather, changing input prices or uncertainty about the prices they will receive at harvest.
Access to suitable financing can help farmers purchase inputs at the right time, maintain equipment, improve storage or expand production where viable.
But agricultural finance must reflect the realities of farming rather than simply apply repayment schedules designed for businesses with regular daily or monthly income.
Loan terms, repayment dates and interest costs can determine whether financing supports productive investment or places additional pressure on farmers.
Financial institutions assessing agricultural lending also need reliable information about borrowers, production plans, expected harvests and market arrangements.
Farmer cooperatives and associations can potentially help members organise records, aggregate demand and engage with lenders, although their effectiveness depends on sound governance and transparent financial management.
Other arrangements, including equipment leasing, group purchasing and carefully structured buyer-financing agreements, may help address specific funding needs.
The Abuja meeting did not announce a quantified new credit facility, a confirmed lending allocation or a new financing agreement for FCT farmers.
The call was for greater support from government, investors and development partners.
Any subsequent initiative would need to clarify its eligibility rules, funding source, repayment terms, delivery timetable and mechanisms for monitoring results.
For farmers, the essential question is whether finance will be available when it is needed, at a cost that can be supported by realistic agricultural earnings.
Timing matters for agricultural inputs
Perpetual Nkechi Okafor also urged the government to align future support programmes with the different planting seasons across Nigeria.
The appeal is important because the agricultural calendar varies by location, crop, rainfall pattern and production system.
An input supplied after the period when a farmer needs it may provide limited benefit for that season, even if the input itself is suitable.
Seeds, fertiliser and other agricultural materials must reach farmers early enough for them to plan and carry out the relevant field operations.
The AFAN FCT chairman acknowledged government support through interventions that included fertiliser distribution, while calling for better alignment between support programmes and local planting seasons.
The concern is not merely about the quantity of inputs distributed but also about their suitability, quality, timing and accessibility.
A programme that delivers fertiliser but does not address transport costs, distribution delays or the ability of farmers to apply it appropriately may not achieve the intended increase in productivity.
Likewise, improved seeds need to be matched to local growing conditions, crop preferences and the requirements of the intended market.
Farmers also need information on appropriate application rates and practices, as well as guidance on managing soil fertility and crop health.
Effective coordination would require agencies to understand regional production calendars and communicate with farmer organisations before distribution begins.
The timing of assistance should be evaluated against actual delivery records and the period in which farmers can use the materials productively.
These details are important when assessing whether public agricultural spending has translated into improved farm performance.
Government officials reaffirm support for farmers
Representatives of government institutions at the celebration reiterated the importance of agricultural productivity, modern farming practices and support for women farmers.
Amaka Uyanwa, representing the Director of the Extension Department of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, encouraged farmers to adopt modern technologies and improved farming practices to increase yields, improve livelihoods and strengthen national food security.
She also reiterated the government's commitment to helping farmers increase production and supply raw materials to industries.
Agricultural extension services can play a role in connecting research and technical knowledge with decisions made on farms.
Farmers may require guidance on crop varieties, soil management, pest control, water use, harvesting methods and the appropriate use of agricultural equipment.
The usefulness of such services depends on whether advice reaches farmers in a timely and practical form and whether farmers can afford to implement the recommendations.
A recommendation to use improved equipment or irrigation, for instance, may have limited value if a farmer has no affordable means of obtaining it.
This reinforces the need to connect extension services with financing, equipment access and market opportunities.
Senator Ireti Kingibe, who represents the FCT, was represented at the event by Hon. Bala Amidu Iyah.
According to the event report, Kingibe also called for increased investment in agriculture, improved access to farming inputs, modern storage facilities and better market opportunities.
She described agriculture as important to food security, employment and economic development and said farmers deserved greater recognition and support to improve productivity and living standards.
The FCT Women Affairs Secretariat, AFAN and other participants similarly emphasised the importance of strengthening agricultural participation and supporting farmers, particularly women.
Representatives of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, OCP Africa, Androm Homes and other organisations also attended and expressed support for efforts to improve agricultural production and food security, according to the event report.
The report did not provide detailed funding commitments or implementation schedules from these organisations.
The next stage will therefore be important in determining whether the discussions result in specific partnerships, programmes or investments.
Cluster farming offers one possible approach
Cluster farming was among the priorities identified by AFAN FCT's chairman.
In a cluster approach, farmers operating in a defined area can coordinate selected activities or share access to services while retaining their individual production responsibilities, depending on the arrangement adopted.
Such coordination can make it easier to organise equipment services, input distribution, training, aggregation and transportation.
It can also help processors and buyers identify areas where sufficient quantities of a particular crop may be available.
For farmers, the potential benefit lies in improving access to services that might be difficult or expensive to organise individually.
For public agencies and investors, clusters can provide a clearer basis for identifying infrastructure requirements and planning the delivery of support.
However, cluster farming is not automatically successful. Participants need clear arrangements for land access, responsibilities, costs, equipment scheduling and the use of shared infrastructure.
Where farmers have different land rights, crops or production objectives, these differences must be considered before a cluster is established.
The location must also be assessed for soil suitability, water availability, road access and proximity to markets.
A cluster that produces large volumes without reliable buyers or processing capacity may create new logistical difficulties rather than resolve existing ones.
Successful planning would therefore connect the production area to the rest of the value chain from the outset.
The FCT farmers' appeal offers a basis for considering this approach, but the event report did not announce a specific cluster-farming project with confirmed locations, acreage or funding.
Those details would need to emerge through subsequent planning and official announcements.
World Food Day places innovation in focus
The farmers' demands came immediately before the 2026 World Food Day observance.
In a notice dated October 14, the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security announced activities for October 15 and 16 under the theme, “Innovate Today, Nourish Tomorrow.”
The ministry said it was collaborating with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and other stakeholders.
The programme for Thursday, October 15, included visits to cluster farms, selected secondary schools and internally displaced persons within the FCT. The stated departure point was the ministry's complex in Area 11, Garki, Abuja, at 9 a.m.
For Friday, October 16, the ministry scheduled a sensitisation walk beginning at 7 a.m., with Millennium Park in the Central Business Area identified as the venue. A ministerial press briefing was also scheduled for 2 p.m. at the ministry's complex.
The ministry described the 2026 edition as marking the 81st anniversary of the FAO's founding and the 46th observance of the celebration in Nigeria. (Source: Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, 2026 World Food Day notice.)
The theme places innovation at the centre of discussions about how food systems can respond to changing needs.
In agriculture, innovation can take several forms. It may involve improved crop varieties, appropriate machinery, better storage, digital information services, more effective irrigation or new methods of connecting farmers with buyers.
Innovation is not limited to advanced technology. A practical arrangement that allows smallholders to hire machinery at the right time or sell produce through a dependable aggregation system can also address a significant production constraint.
The FCT farmers' appeal illustrates why the availability of technology must be matched by access, affordability and effective implementation.
For example, a modern processing machine cannot reduce losses if farmers cannot transport produce to the facility or if the facility lacks reliable power and maintenance.
Likewise, digital agricultural information may help farmers make better decisions, but its usefulness depends on whether the information is timely, understandable and relevant to local conditions.
World Food Day activities can create opportunities for discussion and public awareness, but lasting improvements require investments that continue beyond the commemorative period.
The practical test will be whether innovation leads to better access to resources, stronger farm productivity, reduced losses and more reliable food supplies.
Agricultural development requires coordination
The issues raised in Abuja demonstrate that agricultural development involves several institutions and areas of responsibility.
Access to land may require coordination between land administration authorities, agricultural agencies, local communities and planning bodies.
Mechanisation may involve public equipment inventories, private service providers, training institutions and farmer associations.
Processing facilities require cooperation among farmers, investors, transport operators, energy providers and buyers.
Financing requires the participation of lenders, public programmes, agricultural businesses and organisations that can help farmers prepare credible production plans.
These relationships are particularly important when several constraints affect the same farmer.
Providing equipment without finance for fuel and maintenance may leave a farmer unable to use it. Offering a loan without access to land may not create a viable production opportunity. Increasing harvest volumes without expanding storage or market access may expose farmers to greater losses.
A coordinated approach would begin by identifying the most significant constraints in each farming community.
Authorities could then determine which interventions should be delivered first, which institutions are responsible and how progress will be measured.
Such planning should also distinguish between immediate measures and longer-term investments.
An inventory of existing tractors, for example, may be a practical first step if the reported equipment availability can be verified. Establishing new processing centres would require additional feasibility studies, investment decisions and operating arrangements.
The same principle applies to farmland. Identifying available suitable land may be more useful than announcing broad acreage targets without confirming location, tenure, infrastructure and environmental conditions.
Clear responsibilities and public reporting can help ensure that announced commitments are followed by implementation.
What farmers and authorities should prioritise next
The first priority is to establish a clear picture of farmers' needs across the FCT's six Area Councils.
AFAN FCT's chairman said the association had more than 5,000 members across the territory's six Area Councils. The association could potentially help document members' production activities, equipment requirements, financing constraints and access to markets, subject to appropriate verification and data management. (Source: City Post.)
A detailed assessment could distinguish farmers who primarily need land from those whose immediate problems involve equipment, storage, transport or working capital.
The second priority is to verify the availability and condition of the tractors reportedly lying unused at the National Agricultural Seeds Council premises.
An inventory would need to establish the number of machines, ownership, mechanical condition, repair costs and possible arrangements for their use.
If the equipment can be redeployed, authorities would still need to determine how farmers could apply for access, what fees might apply and who would be responsible for maintenance.
The third priority is to assess opportunities for agricultural processing based on local production and market demand.
Potential projects should be evaluated for their raw-material supply, operating costs, power and water requirements, technical management, food-safety standards and commercial viability.
The fourth priority is to improve the timing and accessibility of agricultural inputs.
Farmers' organisations and relevant agencies could use local production calendars to identify when seeds, fertiliser and other materials must be delivered.
The fifth priority is to strengthen market relationships and agricultural finance.
This could involve better access to price information, transparent purchasing arrangements, collective marketing and financing options that reflect the timing of agricultural income.
Finally, support programmes should track their results. Relevant indicators could include the number of farmers accessing machinery, equipment utilisation, the volume of produce processed, the reduction in post-harvest losses, access to suitable financing and the participation of women farmers.
These indicators would help distinguish between the announcement of a programme and evidence that it is improving agricultural operations.
A call for practical action
The FCT Farmers' Day celebration has brought several interconnected agricultural concerns into focus: access to land, mechanisation, processing, finance, markets and the inclusion of women in agricultural development.
The farmers' message was that these challenges must be addressed if they are to increase production, reduce losses and improve their earnings.
Their demands also highlight the importance of ensuring that existing agricultural resources are used effectively and that new investments are planned around farmers' actual needs.
The Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security's World Food Day programme provides a timely opportunity to discuss the role of innovation in improving food systems. However, the long-term significance of the Abuja celebration will depend on the practical measures that follow.
As of October 14, the available event reports document the farmers' requests and the commitments expressed by participating representatives, but they do not establish that new land allocations, tractor deployments, processing centres or financing facilities have been approved as a direct result of the meeting.
The next step is for the relevant authorities, AFAN, investors and development partners to identify specific actions, clarify responsibilities and establish realistic implementation arrangements.
For farmers, access to land must be accompanied by the means to cultivate it. Machinery must be available when it is needed. Processing facilities must be connected to sufficient supplies and viable markets. Finance must be accessible on workable terms, while agricultural support must reach farmers at the appropriate time.
Addressing these requirements together would offer a more practical route towards improving agricultural productivity and strengthening the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in the Federal Capital Territory.
The challenge now is to translate the demands voiced in Abuja into measurable improvements in the conditions under which farmers produce, preserve and sell food.
Comments
Post a Comment