By Simpson Global Media News Desk
Global food commodity prices climbed to their highest level since November 2022 in September, with cereal, sugar and vegetable-oil costs rising amid weather concerns, geopolitical tensions and disruptions to international trade routes, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has reported.
The FAO Food Price Index averaged 136.0 points in September 2026, up from a revised 134.0 points in August.
The September reading was the highest since November 2022 and represented a 1.5 per cent increase from August.
The latest increase comes after the index had already risen in August, when it reached 133.3 points, its highest level since November 2022 at that time.
The renewed rise has placed international food markets under fresh pressure as traders and governments assess the effects of disruptions affecting grain shipments, adverse weather and the developing El Niño climate pattern.
FAO data show that not all food commodities moved in the same direction.
Cereal, sugar and vegetable-oil prices increased in September, while meat and dairy prices declined.
Sugar reached an 18-month high, while wheat prices rose to their highest level since August 2023 as disruptions to Black Sea trade reduced the availability of some shipments.
FAO Chief Economist Maximo Torero warned that continued logistical and climate-related pressures could eventually feed through to consumer food prices, particularly in economies that depend heavily on imported food.
The latest figures do not indicate that the world has run out of food.
FAO's 2026 global cereal-production forecast remains close to 2.979 billion tonnes, which would still represent the second-largest harvest on record.
But the agency has reduced its expectations for global cereal trade because of restrictions and disruptions affecting wheat and maize shipments, particularly from the Black Sea region.
That distinction is central to the current situation.
The pressure is being created not simply by how much food is produced globally, but by where it is produced, how it moves between countries and how much it costs to transport it to consumers.
Food prices move higher again
The FAO Food Price Index is a benchmark that tracks monthly changes in the international prices of a basket of globally traded food commodities.
It covers five broad groups: cereals, vegetable oils, dairy, meat and sugar.
The index is designed to measure changes in international commodity prices rather than retail food prices in individual countries.
Consequently, a rise in the index does not mean that food prices in every country increase by exactly the same percentage.
Local prices are also influenced by exchange rates, transport costs, taxes, subsidies, domestic production, storage, market competition and government policy.
Nevertheless, sustained increases in international commodity prices can place pressure on countries that rely on imports.
The September reading of 136.0 points means the benchmark has moved significantly higher from the levels recorded earlier in the year.
The increase also places the index only slightly below its November 2022 level, when global food markets were still being heavily affected by the disruption that followed Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
The September 2026 level remains below the record reached in March 2022.
FAO's historical series shows that the March 2022 peak was substantially higher than the current reading.
That means the latest development should not be confused with the extraordinary global food-price shock experienced immediately after the invasion of Ukraine.
It does, however, demonstrate that international food markets have again entered a period of heightened price pressure.
Cereals emerge as a major source of pressure
Cereals are particularly important because wheat, maize and rice form the basis of diets and food-processing industries in many parts of the world.
The September increase was driven in part by higher cereal prices.
Reuters reported that wheat futures reached a three-year high as disruptions to Black Sea trade affected international supplies.
The Black Sea region is one of the world's most important grain-exporting areas.
Russia and Ukraine are major suppliers of wheat and other agricultural commodities, while the region's ports provide access to international buyers across Africa, the Middle East and Asia.
When ships, ports, storage facilities or transport routes are disrupted, buyers may have to search for alternative suppliers.
That can increase the cost of both the commodity and the freight required to move it.
The consequences can spread well beyond the countries where the disruption occurs.
A miller in North Africa, an importer in Asia or a food processor in the Middle East may have to compete with other buyers for wheat from Australia, Argentina, Europe or North America.
The resulting competition can push prices higher in markets far from the original disruption.
Reuters reported last month that Asian buyers were already turning to Australian and Argentine wheat as Black Sea disruptions affected shipments.
Some of those alternative supplies were significantly more expensive than Black Sea cargoes.
Black Sea logistics remain a critical issue
The Black Sea has become one of the most closely watched regions in global agricultural markets because of its importance to grain exports and the continuing Russia-Ukraine war.
Attacks on vessels and port infrastructure have disrupted normal trade flows.
Reuters reported in September that several Russian Black Sea and Sea of Azov grain terminals had been damaged, representing a significant amount of annual export capacity.
The analysis found that some undamaged terminals could potentially restart operations relatively quickly if security conditions improved, while damaged facilities could require months of repairs.
The uncertainty surrounding the region has encouraged importers to seek alternative suppliers and has contributed to higher grain prices.
The effect is particularly important for countries that normally source large quantities of wheat from Russia or Ukraine.
Importers cannot simply replace millions of tonnes of grain overnight.
They have to negotiate new contracts, secure shipping capacity, arrange insurance and manage longer transport routes.
The alternative grain may also be of a different quality or require different milling processes.
All of those factors can raise the cost of supplying food markets.
The longer disruptions persist, the more likely it becomes that buyers will make structural adjustments to their sourcing arrangements.
That could alter global grain-trade patterns even after individual disruptions have ended.
Wheat becomes more expensive for importers
Wheat is one of the commodities most directly affected by the current supply and logistics problems.
Reuters reported in September that benchmark Chicago wheat futures had risen about 40 per cent from June lows to a three-and-a-half-year high.
The increase came as importers faced difficulties securing Black Sea shipments.
Russia is the world's largest wheat exporter, while Ukraine remains a significant supplier despite the continuing war.
The disruption has encouraged major buyers to look elsewhere.
Asian importers have reportedly purchased wheat from Australia and Argentina at prices above the levels previously available from the Black Sea.
That shift demonstrates how logistics can affect prices even when global production remains large.
If wheat exists in warehouses but cannot be shipped efficiently to the country where it is needed, the effective supply available to that buyer becomes tighter.
The buyer may then pay a premium for grain from another origin.
This is one reason why international food markets can experience price increases without a corresponding collapse in global production.
Sugar adds another source of pressure
Sugar was another important contributor to the September increase.
FAO's sugar price benchmark reached an 18-month high.
The market has been affected by concerns about production in several major growing regions.
Weather conditions in Brazil, India, Thailand and parts of Europe have influenced expectations about future supplies.
Brazil is especially important to the international sugar market because of its role as a major producer and exporter.
Changes in Brazilian production can therefore have an immediate effect on global expectations.
FAO had already reported a sharp rise in sugar prices in August.
At that time, the sugar index increased by 11.9 per cent from July, reaching its highest level since June 2025.
Concerns included weather-related risks in major producing areas and lower production expectations in Brazil's important centre-south region.
The September increase indicates that sugar-market pressure did not disappear after the August jump.
Sugar prices matter not only to consumers buying household sugar.
They also affect food manufacturers that use sugar as an input for beverages, confectionery, bakery products and processed foods.
Higher commodity prices can therefore work through the supply chain in several stages before reaching consumers.
Vegetable oils also rise
Vegetable oils recorded another increase in September.
The commodity group includes globally traded oils such as palm, soybean and sunflower oil.
These products are used extensively in cooking and food manufacturing.
Palm oil is particularly important to global edible-oil markets because of the scale of production in Southeast Asia.
Changes in palm-oil prices can influence the broader vegetable-oil market and affect food manufacturers in countries that depend on imports.
The September increase occurred even as some individual vegetable-oil markets faced different supply and demand conditions.
This illustrates why the FAO index measures a weighted basket rather than relying on a single commodity.
A rise in one major commodity can coincide with a decline in another.
The overall index reflects the combined movement of the five groups.
Meat and dairy move in the opposite direction
The September report also contains an important counterpoint to the broader increase.
Meat and dairy prices declined during the month.
This means the increase in the overall index was not caused by every food category becoming more expensive simultaneously.
The divergence reflects differences in production cycles, inventories, demand and international trade conditions.
Dairy markets, for example, respond to milk production, feed costs, weather and demand from importing countries.
Meat markets are influenced by livestock supplies, feed availability, consumer demand and export conditions.
A fall in one category can partly offset increases elsewhere.
The September index nonetheless rose because the increases in cereals, sugar and vegetable oils outweighed the declines in meat and dairy.
Climate pressure enters the equation
Weather has become an increasingly important factor in food-market expectations.
FAO has warned that climate shocks are converging with geopolitical tensions and disrupted trade logistics.
The concern is not limited to one region.
Farmers in different parts of the world have experienced heat, drought or excessive rainfall, creating uncertainty over crop yields.
A major harvest shortfall in one producing region can tighten global supplies even if other countries have adequate harvests.
Markets respond to expectations as well as confirmed shortages.
If traders believe that weather conditions could reduce production several months from now, prices can begin moving before the crop is harvested.
That is because buyers and sellers are making decisions based on expected future availability.
The developing El Niño pattern has therefore become an important factor in commodity-market discussions.
El Niño raises additional uncertainty
El Niño is a recurring climate pattern involving abnormal warming of surface waters in the central and eastern tropical Pacific.
Its effects extend beyond the Pacific because changes in atmospheric circulation can alter rainfall and temperature patterns in other regions.
The exact consequences vary by location and season.
For agriculture, this makes El Niño a risk factor rather than a guarantee of a specific harvest outcome.
Some areas may receive less rainfall, while others may experience different weather conditions.
FAO and other international agencies are monitoring the pattern because of its potential effects on agricultural production.
Reuters reported that the September food-price increase was partly linked to climate concerns surrounding the developing El Niño.
The uncertainty is important because farmers, traders and governments need time to prepare for possible changes in production.
If forecasts point towards lower output for an important crop, importers may increase purchases or build stocks.
That additional demand can itself influence prices.
Global production remains relatively strong
Despite the rise in prices, FAO's latest outlook does not point to a collapse in global cereal production.
The organisation's forecast for 2026 cereal output is approximately 2.979 billion tonnes.
That would be the second-largest cereal harvest on record.
The figure is important because it demonstrates that the current market pressure is not simply a story of insufficient global production.
There is still a very large quantity of grain being produced.
The problem is more complicated.
Trade disruptions can prevent supplies from moving efficiently.
Weather can reduce production in particular regions.
Higher energy and transport costs can increase the cost of moving food.
Importers may compete for alternative supplies.
Currency movements can also affect the local cost of commodities.
Together, those factors can produce higher international prices even when aggregate global production remains historically large.
FAO's latest assessment therefore combines a large production forecast with a more cautious outlook for international cereal trade.
Cereal trade forecasts cut
FAO has reduced its expectation for global cereal trade because of constraints affecting wheat and maize exports.
Reuters reported that the agency trimmed its cereal-trade expectations by 0.7 per cent.
The reduction reflects difficulties in moving some supplies through the Black Sea.
This matters because international food security depends not only on production but also on trade.
Countries do not all grow enough of the crops they consume.
Some import large quantities of wheat, rice or maize every year.
Trade allows food to move from surplus-producing regions to deficit areas.
When trade is disrupted, countries with limited domestic production may face higher costs even if global stocks remain substantial.
For import-dependent economies, this can create pressure on food inflation, foreign-exchange requirements and household budgets.
Why import-dependent countries are exposed
The impact of global food prices is not uniform.
A country that produces most of its staple foods domestically may be less directly exposed to international commodity-price increases.
An import-dependent country may be more vulnerable.
The degree of exposure also depends on exchange rates.
If the local currency weakens against the dollar, imported commodities can become more expensive even if the international dollar price remains unchanged.
Transport costs provide another layer.
A grain shipment must be moved from the exporting country to a port, loaded onto a vessel, transported internationally, unloaded and distributed to mills or other processors.
Each stage can add to the final cost.
Insurance premiums can also increase when vessels operate near conflict zones.
Consequently, the international commodity price reported by FAO is only one component of the final cost paid by consumers.
Implications for Africa
Africa is particularly important in the current food-price discussion because several countries rely heavily on imported wheat and other staples.
North African countries are major wheat buyers.
Several countries in sub-Saharan Africa also import substantial quantities of wheat for flour, bread and other processed foods.
The effects of higher global prices can therefore spread through food-processing industries.
A flour mill that pays more for imported wheat may face higher production costs.
Bakeries can face higher flour prices.
Transporters may pay more for fuel.
Retailers then confront higher wholesale costs.
The final impact on households depends on the extent to which each part of the supply chain absorbs or passes on those increases.
Reuters has reported that African and Middle Eastern wheat buyers have been among those seeking alternative supplies as Black Sea disruptions have complicated normal trade flows.
Nigeria and the global food market
Nigeria's position in the international food system makes the global development relevant domestically.
The country produces large quantities of several crops, including maize, rice, cassava and other staples.
At the same time, Nigeria imports some food commodities and agricultural inputs.
Wheat is particularly important because domestic wheat production does not currently meet the full requirements of the country's milling and baking industries.
Bread, noodles, pasta and other products depend heavily on wheat.
That means developments in international wheat prices can affect Nigerian food businesses even when Nigerian farmers are producing well.
Higher global wheat prices can increase the cost of imported grain.
Changes in freight costs and exchange rates can amplify the effect.
The eventual impact on Nigerian consumers depends on domestic supply, the naira exchange rate, import costs, local processing expenses and government policy.
The international FAO index should therefore not be interpreted as a direct forecast of Nigerian food prices.
It is instead an indicator of conditions in global commodity markets.
Domestic production remains a key buffer
One of the most important ways countries can reduce exposure to global food-market shocks is by strengthening domestic production and supply chains.
That does not eliminate the need for international trade.
Countries will continue to import commodities they cannot produce efficiently and export commodities in which they have a surplus.
But stronger domestic production can provide a buffer when international markets become volatile.
Nigeria's agricultural policies have increasingly focused on productivity, irrigation, improved inputs, extension services, storage and value-chain development.
Those efforts are relevant to food-price resilience.
Higher yields can increase domestic supply.
Better storage can reduce post-harvest losses.
Improved roads and logistics can reduce the cost of moving food between producing regions and major markets.
More efficient processing can also reduce dependence on imported processed foods.
The current global price environment highlights the importance of all of these factors.
Food prices are not the same as food insecurity
Another distinction is necessary.
Higher international food prices do not automatically mean that every country is facing food insecurity.
Food insecurity depends on people's ability to obtain sufficient, safe and nutritious food.
Income levels, employment, domestic production, social protection and government intervention all matter.
A household can be affected by a global commodity-price increase even when food remains physically available.
If wages do not rise at the same pace as food prices, purchasing power can decline.
Poorer households typically devote a larger proportion of their income to food, making them particularly sensitive to price increases.
This is why international food-price movements receive attention from governments and development agencies.
The issue is not only commodity trading.
It concerns household welfare, nutrition and economic stability.
The difference between global benchmarks and retail prices
The FAO Food Price Index measures international commodity prices.
It does not measure the price of a loaf of bread, a bag of rice or a kilogram of meat in a Nigerian, British, Indian or American supermarket.
Retail prices contain many additional costs.
These include processing, packaging, transport, labour, storage, taxes, rent and retail margins.
Government subsidies or price controls can also affect the relationship between international and domestic prices.
For this reason, a 1.5 per cent monthly rise in the FAO index should not be interpreted as a prediction that household food bills will rise by 1.5 per cent everywhere.
The index instead provides a broad measure of pressure in internationally traded food commodities.
Its importance lies in identifying changes in the global environment that may eventually affect national markets.
The energy connection
Food production and distribution are closely linked to energy markets.
Farmers use fuel for tractors, irrigation equipment and harvesting machinery.
Fertiliser production can require substantial amounts of energy.
Food processors depend on electricity and fuel.
Ships, trucks and trains require energy to transport commodities.
When energy prices rise, the cost of moving food can increase even if the commodity itself has not become more expensive.
Geopolitical disruptions to energy supply can therefore affect food markets indirectly.
The September FAO increase occurred against a backdrop of international tensions and transport disruptions.
The combination makes the food system more vulnerable to sudden changes in shipping costs and availability.
Shipping routes matter
International food trade depends on a limited number of major maritime routes.
The Black Sea is one.
Other strategically important routes include the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal and major Asian shipping corridors.
Disruptions at any of these locations can increase voyage times, insurance costs or freight rates.
A ship that has to take a longer route may require more fuel and spend additional days at sea.
Those costs eventually become part of the delivered price of the commodity.
The current food-price increase has therefore highlighted the relationship between geopolitics and agricultural markets.
A conflict thousands of kilometres from a farm can still affect the price paid by a food importer.
The importance of inventories
Stocks provide another buffer.
When harvests are good and inventories are high, buyers can rely on stored commodities when new production or shipments are delayed.
When inventories are low, even a relatively modest disruption can have a larger price effect.
FAO's earlier September outlook had already reduced projected cereal stocks at the close of the 2026/27 season.
The agency's forecast remained substantial, but the change indicated less room for error in some parts of the market.
Stocks therefore remain an important indicator for traders and policymakers.
A large harvest can reduce pressure if it replenishes inventories.
Conversely, repeated weather shocks or trade disruptions can gradually consume the available buffer.
The outlook for 2027
The international food-price outlook will depend on several variables during the months ahead.
Weather will remain central.
The development and strength of El Niño will influence agricultural conditions in different producing regions.
The Russia-Ukraine war will continue to affect Black Sea logistics.
Shipping security will determine whether grain can move through important export routes.
Brazilian, European and Asian crop conditions will influence sugar and other agricultural commodities.
Energy prices will affect production and transportation costs.
Currency movements will affect the purchasing power of food-importing countries.
None of these factors can be isolated completely.
A favourable harvest in one major exporting country can offset a shortfall elsewhere.
Likewise, a new shipping disruption can erase some of the benefits of strong production.
That is why international food markets can change rapidly even when long-term production forecasts remain relatively stable.
FAO maintains a large production outlook
The continued strength of the global cereal-production forecast provides an important element of reassurance.
FAO's current estimate of roughly 2.979 billion tonnes would still make 2026 one of the strongest cereal-production years on record.
This means that the world has a substantial agricultural base from which to meet demand.
But the forecast does not remove the importance of trade.
A grain surplus in one country does not automatically solve a shortage in another.
The grain must be harvested, stored, transported and sold.
Infrastructure and logistics are therefore as important as the production number itself.
The current market demonstrates this point clearly.
The global cereal supply is large, but disruption in key export corridors is contributing to higher prices.
What governments are watching
Governments and food agencies will be watching several indicators in the months ahead.
They will monitor domestic food prices, import costs and available stocks.
They will also track international grain quotations and shipping conditions.
Weather forecasts will be important for farmers and commodity traders.
Countries that depend heavily on imports may consider increasing purchases or adjusting procurement schedules when prices become favourable.
Others may focus on domestic production and strategic reserves.
The appropriate response will differ from one country to another.
An exporting country may be more concerned with protecting its producers and maintaining foreign-exchange earnings.
An importing country may focus on affordability and food security.
Both are affected by the same international commodity markets.
What the latest FAO reading does and does not show
The September FAO index provides a clear snapshot of rising international food-commodity prices.
It shows that the overall benchmark increased from 134.0 to 136.0 points.
It shows that the latest level was the highest since November 2022.
It shows that cereals, sugar and vegetable oils were among the categories pushing the index higher.
It also shows that meat and dairy moved lower.
But the index does not establish that a new global food crisis is underway.
Global cereal production remains very high.
Nor does the index establish how much food prices will increase in any particular country.
Domestic economic conditions vary considerably.
The significance of the latest reading is that several sources of pressure are occurring at the same time: weather uncertainty, geopolitical disruption and logistical constraints.
That combination is being closely monitored by international food agencies and commodity markets.
A market under pressure, but not without buffers
The current situation is therefore more complex than a simple rise-or-fall story.
Food prices have risen.
Some important commodities have recorded substantial increases.
Trade routes remain vulnerable to disruption.
Weather conditions are creating uncertainty.
But global cereal production remains historically large.
Stocks still provide a buffer.
Alternative exporters are available for some commodities.
And governments and international organisations have information systems that can identify changes in food markets earlier than was possible in previous decades.
Those buffers can help reduce the impact of individual shocks.
Their effectiveness will depend on how long current disruptions persist and whether additional shocks occur.
The next critical months
The coming months will be important for global food markets.
The Northern Hemisphere harvests will provide new information about actual crop yields.
Weather developments will help determine whether current concerns translate into significant production losses.
Black Sea shipping conditions will influence the availability and price of wheat and maize.
Sugar markets will remain sensitive to production estimates from Brazil, India, Thailand and Europe.
Vegetable-oil prices will respond to crop conditions and demand from food and energy industries.
Governments will also monitor domestic food inflation and the impact on vulnerable households.
FAO's regular Food Price Index releases will provide another reference point as the market develops.
The organisation's published calendar shows that the index is released monthly, allowing traders, policymakers and food agencies to track changes in international commodity prices.
Implications for global food security
The current increase reinforces a broader lesson about food security.
Producing enough food globally is necessary but not sufficient.
Food must also be affordable and physically accessible.
It must move efficiently from farms to processors, ports, wholesalers and consumers.
International markets need functioning transport systems and predictable trade routes.
Farmers need reliable access to inputs.
Governments need accurate information to respond to emerging shortages.
Consumers need sufficient purchasing power to buy food.
A disruption in any one part of that chain can create pressure elsewhere.
The September FAO index reflects several of these pressures at the same time.
The result is a global food market that is more expensive than it was earlier in the year.
A warning for import-dependent economies
For countries that rely substantially on imported staples, the latest figures provide another reason to monitor international commodity markets closely.
Higher global prices can increase import bills.
If the local currency is under pressure, the domestic effect can be larger.
Governments may then face difficult choices involving subsidies, tariffs, strategic reserves or other market interventions.
Food manufacturers may also adjust their sourcing strategies.
Some may seek alternative suppliers.
Others may reduce production costs or modify product formulations.
The choices available depend on the commodity involved and the country's domestic production capacity.
Nigeria and other African economies will be watching wheat, maize, rice, vegetable oils and other internationally traded staples closely as the global market develops.
The role of domestic resilience
The international situation also strengthens the case for policies that improve domestic agricultural productivity.
For Nigeria, that includes improving yields, expanding irrigation, strengthening agricultural extension, reducing post-harvest losses and developing storage and transport infrastructure.
Domestic production cannot completely isolate a country from global markets.
But it can provide an important buffer.
A farmer who can produce more per hectare contributes more to domestic supply.
A better storage system can preserve more of the harvest.
A reliable road network can reduce the cost of moving food.
Efficient local processing can reduce dependence on imported finished products.
Together, these measures can improve resilience when global commodity prices rise.
The global picture heading into the final quarter
September's FAO reading arrives as the global economy enters the final quarter of 2026 with several interconnected uncertainties.
Geopolitical conflicts continue to affect shipping and commodity routes.
Climate conditions are influencing crop expectations.
Energy markets remain sensitive to international tensions.
Food-importing countries are dealing with the possibility of higher procurement costs.
At the same time, global cereal production remains near record levels.
This combination makes the outlook difficult to reduce to a single prediction.
The direction of food prices will depend on whether production, trade and logistics improve or whether additional disruptions occur.
For now, the latest evidence shows that international food prices have moved higher for a second consecutive month.
What happens next
FAO's next monthly food-price data will provide another indication of whether September's increase represents a temporary movement or the continuation of a broader upward trend.
In the meantime, commodity markets will continue watching the Black Sea, weather conditions in major producing countries, the development of El Niño and the availability of alternative grain supplies.
Importers will also have to decide how much risk they are willing to carry in their inventories.
Buying too early can expose companies to high prices if markets later fall.
Waiting too long can expose them to even higher prices if supply disruptions worsen.
That uncertainty is one reason international commodity markets can remain volatile even when production forecasts are relatively strong.
A renewed test for the food system
The September figures do not represent a repeat of the record food-price shock of 2022.
The current FAO index remains below its March 2022 record, and global cereal production remains exceptionally high.
But the latest increase demonstrates that the international food system remains sensitive to the interaction of climate, conflict and logistics.
The index's movement from 134.0 points in August to 136.0 in September is a measurable indication of renewed pressure.
The increase in cereals is particularly significant because grain is fundamental to food production in many countries.
The rise in sugar and vegetable oils adds further pressure across food-processing markets.
The decline in meat and dairy prices shows that the pressure is not universal, but the overall balance remains upward.
For countries that import significant quantities of food, the developments warrant close monitoring.
For agricultural producers, the situation reinforces the importance of productivity, climate resilience and access to markets.
For governments, it highlights the importance of food stocks, trade routes and timely market information.
And for consumers, the global benchmark is a reminder that international developments can eventually influence the price of food far beyond the regions where crops are grown.
The immediate outlook remains dependent on developments that are still unfolding.
A strong global harvest could ease pressure.
Improved shipping conditions could lower premiums associated with disrupted routes.
But additional weather shocks, prolonged conflict or further logistical restrictions could keep prices elevated.
The FAO's September reading therefore arrives not as a final verdict on the global food market, but as a fresh indicator of the pressures currently shaping it.
With the index at 136.0 points, international food prices are now at their highest level since November 2022.
The next stage will depend on whether the world's farmers, traders, shipping networks and governments can absorb the combined pressures of climate uncertainty, geopolitical disruption and changing global demand.
For now, the evidence points to a food market under renewed pressure — but one that still retains substantial production capacity and important buffers against a deeper supply shock.
Comments
Post a Comment